Suppose two people, Part A and Part B, enter into a contract. Subsequently, it is established that Part A did not fully understand the facts and information described in the treaty. If Part B used this lack of understanding against Part A to conclude the contract, Part A has the right to cancel the contract.  Sometimes the ability of individuals or artificial persons to enforce contracts or to enforce contracts is limited. For example, very young children should not be seen as good deals they have done assuming they do not have the maturity to understand what they are doing; Employees or managers may be prevented from entering into contracts for their company because they have acted in an ultra vires manner (beyond their power). Another example could be people who are unable to act mentally, either because of a disability or through drunk driving.  Some arbitration clauses are unenforceable and, in other cases, an arbitration procedure is not sufficient to resolve a dispute. For example, disputes over the validity of registered intellectual property rights may be settled by a public body within the national registration system.  In the case of matters of significant public interest that go beyond the narrow interests of the parties to the agreement, such as allegations that a party breached a contract by committing unlawful anti-competitive conduct or committing civil rights violations, a court may find that the parties may assert one or all of their rights before contracting out.  Although agreements may be reached in any form, including unspoken behaviour between the parties (UCC Section 2-204 (1)), they are generally structured in the form of an offer and acceptance. Note, however, that not all agreements in the broadest sense must consist of an offer and acceptance, so it is quite possible that two people will reach an agreement without entering into a contract. For example, people may agree that the weather is pleasant or that it would be better to go to Chinese food rather than watch a foreign movie; In neither case, no contract was entered into. One of the main tasks of contract law is to resolve legally binding agreements – treaties – of agreements that are not.
In India, electronic contracts are subject to the Indian Contract Act (1872), under which certain conditions must be met, while making valid contact. Some sections of the Information Technology Act (2000) also provide for the validity of online contracts.  Among the factors constituting an alleged formation of contracts is: a contract is a legally binding document between at least two parties, which defines and regulates the rights and obligations of the parties to an agreement.  A contract is legally enforceable because it complies with the requirements and approval of the law. A contract usually involves the exchange of goods, services, money or promises from one of them. « breach of contract » means that the law must grant the victim either access to remedies, such as damages, or annulment.  The parties must intend to enter into a legally binding agreement, otherwise there will be no contract. This is assumed in commercial transactions, but can be refuted with obvious evidence to the contrary, such as explicit formulations that are not related, for example.B. The term « in accordance with the treaty » may contribute to this, but it is inconclusive. If the contractual terms are uncertain or incomplete, the parties do not reach an agreement in the eyes of the law.  An agreement is not a contract and the inability to agree on key issues that may include price or security elements may lead to the failure of the entire contract.